⁣Federal Reserve, Bank Of England, NWO, Rockefeller, Goldman Sachs, Grat Reset, Baksters, Banking Cartels, Depopulation, Mind Control, Genocide

Though Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and Carlos Slim are supposedly "the richest men in the world," their combined wealth of $180 billion would qualify them as mere servants for the House of Rothschild.

Rothschild owns the Bank of England and the London gold bullion exchange where Rothschild sets the daily international market price for gold. Rothschild owns the gold and diamond mines of S. Africa and major extractive industries such as Rio Tinto and British Petroleum.

Rothschild financed England and France in the Napoleonic wars. Rothschild knew who won the Battle of Waterloo a day before the King of England and British investors. Rothschild caused a selling panic in the London bond "consul" market intimating to investors that England lost to Napoleon. Bonds issued by the Bank of England to finance the war crashed and sold for pennies on the dollar.

Rothschild sold to drive the price down and then bought all the bonds back at rock bottom prices. The next day when word of England's victory over Napoleon hit the market, bond prices soared. Rothschild made 40 times his investment in one day on insider knowledge. Rothschild also made 30 percent interest on the gold he loaned to the kings to fight each other.

The king issued bonds as a debt obligation to Rothschild to be paid by future taxes on British citizens. The ensuing debt was so much that Rothschild was able to take over ownership of the Bank of England, which subsequently financed the mercenary German Hessians to fight the American revolutionaries in colonial America because Washington issued its own money called greenbacks. It wasn't about tea.

Rothschild owns major European Central Banks: England, Switzerland, France, Germany, and Belgium – central bank for the Euro. Rothschild partnered with the original seven American families who became the regional depository banks in the US Federal Reserve. The Bush family and J.P. Morgan are the political and financial dynasties evolved from their original ownership of the Federal Reserve. Political propaganda confuses American citizens into thinking the U.S. government owns and prints its own money. Not so. Bush, J.P. Morgan and five other banking family institutions own the Federal Reserve in partnership with Rothschild.

Rothschild owns Reuters News Service, which bought the Associated Press. Rothschild owns or virtually controls every major media outlet in America, Europe and Israel. Rothschild controls the message of who really owns $500 trillion of hidden untaxed wealth equal to half of annual world GDP.

https://www.tabletmag.com/sect....ions/arts-letters/ar

https://paulsalmons.associates..../blog/conspiracy-the

⁣A documentary exposing the evil Satanists plans to create a New World Order.
Soon after World War I and in connection with the formation of the League of Nations the American president Woodrow Wilson used the term ‘new world order’, hoping that it would finally become possible to create a system for maintaining international peace and security; meanwhile, the political order had already existed in the Western world for several centuries. In historical terms it would be more precise to speak about the international order when the European order transformed into the global one. Moreover, prior to the European order the inchoate international order could be found in other regions of the World System (the most famous here being the Pax Romania).
Thus, with respect to globalization, the search for the origins of the world order leads back to the ancient times. Yet, in historical terms the notion of the world order seems rather amorphous. The humanity has passed a long and perilous way to the establishment of certain international rules and foundations of co-existence. It is worth analyzing them just in terms of the formation (and development) of the world order and the way in which the obtained experience can be employed for making predictions on the forthcoming transformations.

The notions of globalization and world order have become rather closely connected today. The countries' mutual influence as well as the impact of global processes on nations and states are evident today (Ilyin and Leonova 2015). Within the political realm globalization considerably affects the transformation of the states' sovereign prerogatives since it contributes to the change and reduction of the scope of the states' sovereign powers.

It is obvious that the unfolding globalization cannot but complete with some institutionalizing of the relations in the foreign policy sphere although this path is difficult and ambiguous.

⁣"2000 Mules," a documentary film created by Dinesh D'Souza, exposes widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group True the Vote, "2000 Mules" offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video.


“2000 Mules” is not as much the hard-hitting expose of the 2020 election that viewers might expect from its marketing. The movie is actually a great overview of election fraud that has been taking place for the past decade. And the research it features leaves a big question wide open.
Still, “2000 Mules” is a major, real bombshell.
The documentary comes from political pundit Dinesh D’Souza and familiar collaborators, including director Bruce Schooley, and D’Souza’s wife, Debbie, who has also produced his other movies, most recently “Trump Card” in 2018. It features research conducted by election integrity watchdog True the Vote.
Much criticism has been leveled at the use of cellphone data in “2000 Mules” to track “mules,” or ballot traffickers, and estimate the number of fraudulent votes in the 2020 election that gave Joe Biden the win over Donald Trump. This writer finds the cellphone data to be credible. The data is what makes “2000 Mules” a bombshell, the kind that comes along once in a century. It is the research methodology that is flawed. (More on this later.)
First, the findings that D’Souza presents to viewers are shocking. He asks incisive questions of True the Vote’s founder Catherine Engelbrecht and top researcher Glenn Phillips, leading the viewer through the complex data. Here is what they tell us:
Atlanta: 242 mules that went to an average of 24 ballot dropboxes and eight organizations in a two-week period.
Phoenix, 200+ mules
Milwaukee, 100 mules
Michigan, 500 mules
Philadelphia, 1,100 mules going to 50 dropboxes each. People driving to New Jersey possibly to pick up ballots.
The movie estimates that calculating for the ballot trafficking, Trump would have won with 305 electoral votes.
The movement of the mules shows that the fraud was deliberate.
“To get to some of these dropboxes, it had to be intentional. You had to get off the highway, go on some street, you had to turn in somewhere in order to get to those dropboxes,” Phillips said.
And Engelbrecht remarks on the gaslighting by the media in the aftermath.
“Now the narrative needs to be that this is the most secure election, this is the most fabulous election we have ever had. Pay no mind to the millions of Americans that are saying something is not right,” Engelbrecht said.
The movie also takes the audience through other kinds of ballot harvesting and ballot trafficking, including the exploitation of the disabled and the elderly, and the bullying of vulnerable populations, immigrants and the homeless.
It also mentions the well-known case in North Carolina of the Mark Harris campaign in 2018 as a prime example of ballot trafficking.
All of this information makes “2000 Mules” a great overview on election fraud. But the methodology of the research into the 2020 presidential election has one glaring flaw.
True the Vote seems to make assumptions on the nonprofits, or the “stash houses” where the fraudulent ballots are kept, as one of the starting point of its research along with the ballot dropboxes, for pinpointing the movements of the mules. Additionally, D’Souza never explains or even gives a hint of who these nonprofits are. So the viewer is left in the dark. This begs the question: Did True the Vote have a preset list of nonprofits they knew were stash houses from previous research, instead of determining who the stash houses are from the mules? Is the research completely nonpartisan?
D’Souza has answered a similar question from a viewer here, but has not addressed this concern. In journalism, you can provide hints for who the nonprofits are. For example, are they big nonprofits with obvious political leanings or small nonprofits doing unrelated work, like animal rescue? D’Souza and his producers not giving any hints at all leaves a big piece of the puzzle off the table.

⁣Facebook has a director of social good. She is called Hema and if she has a surname, we weren’t privy to it. The BBC’s Horizon team, as if bewitched at being granted unprecedented access to the social network, bowed to its ethos by captioning interviewees by first name only. But access is like sex: it’s not what you have, but what you do with it that matters.
We met David, the director of harmful behaviour (tough gig, if his task is to stop it, rather than enable it), Monika, who is head of global policy management, and Vlad, Facebook’s head of artificial intelligence, though he will always be The Impaler to me. Sadly, we didn’t get to see Nick, but David Cameron’s former fig leaf has become Mark Zuckerberg’s now he is Facebook’s vice-president of global affairs. Mention Cleggmania in Menlo Park and nobody will know what you are on about.
By rolling over and waving its paws in this way, Horizon abolished critical distance from the global techno-oligarchy with 3.1 billion users and pretensions to ensnare the rest of us. (Facebook is building eight more data centres in the next few years with the aim of doubling storage to accommodate our data.) It put us on chummy terms with the outfit at a vexed moment. Can it change after last week’s $5bn (£4bn) fine for privacy violations in the Cambridge Analytica data breach?
In a meta sense, that was fitting: murdering distance and importuning strangers with simulations of friendliness is Facebook’s MO. It is why revenue exceeded $55bn last year. In another sense, though, this documentary almost amounted to an hour-long commercial for which Zuckerberg didn’t pay.
We witnessed how Facebook is ostensibly striving to use technical fixes to annihilate the human bugs out there – the scammers, hatemongers, sextortioners, e-groomers, Nazis, hackers and black marketeers. This was fascinating in its own right. Can artificial intelligence be used to detect other artificial intelligences posing as humans? How can hate speech by emoji be eliminated?
Fascinating, too, was the cult-like induction ceremony for incoming engineers, tens of thousands of whom are being hired, to ensure Facebook no longer has difficult years like 2018. Soon, they will join the Facebook faithful. Why are there so many balloons in Facebook offices? Because staff have two birthdays, the second celebrating when they joined this evangelising outfit.
“We’re not a company that is designed to make money,” Kyle, director of product, told a room of so-called Newbs in London. No one so much as rolled an eye. “That means every product we make is tuned for ‘does it do good in the world?’” he continued. But what is good? Maybe connecting the world to Facebook, monetising data and believing both are self-evidently good are the problems.
Facebook treats its difficulties as external ones and its task is to seal itself from them. But the corruption is inside, part of the very organisation’s ethos. It is Horror Movie 101. Everyone interviewed here was, as it were, wearing Clegg’s fig leaf to hide that unacceptable truth. “We’re a community that is designed to create communities and let those communities make a difference in the world,” Kyle added.
But Facebook is a business not a community, and when it creates communities they sometimes make a difference in a bad way. “We don’t tolerate dicks,” said Jonny, head of internal communications. Instead, Facebook enables them. Tommy Robinson was jailed earlier this month for live streaming, via Facebook, defendants arriving at court in a sexual grooming trial.
One critic complained about how Facebook had “destabled democracy”. Horizon needed more eloquent dissenters. Maybe she meant that if Facebook is a horse and democracy is a door, the former has bolted and the latter is coming off its hinges. It was hard to be sure.
Back to the commercial. Hema told how her father, who had liver cancer, lost a litre of blood an hour. If there had been an online facility matching blood supply to demand, he need not have died so quickly.
So she made it her mission to establish just that facility for 70 countries where blood transfusions don’t happen because of supply problems. Cut to her team, thrilled that 11 million users have signed up to its blood market. We learned later, though, this initiative enables a black market for blood in India. An unintentional consequence, perhaps, but given earlier online scams, a foreseeable one.
The Horizon team never met Hema’s opposite number, the director of social bad. Chet (no surname) works in a basement tasked with reversing what happened in Facebook’s difficult 2018. Not the data breaches or live-streamed mass murder in Christchurch, but the really unacceptable thing, namely how 20% was slashed from the value of Facebook shares on news that its ad revenue per user was declining and user growth slowing. Such things can never happen again, Chet realises.
Fake news. Facebook has no director of social bad. No Chet in a basement. Nobody in the social network is tasked with squeezing more money from its users. Facebook is all good.
REVIEW RESOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/tv....-and-radio/2019/jul/

⁣An exposé on how Hollywood and the mainstream media manipulate the multitudes by spreading propaganda throughout their content.
The movie is banned most of the media.
The Out Of Shadows documentary lifts the mask on how the mainstream media & Hollywood manipulate & control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content. Our goal is to wake up the general public by shedding light on how we all have been lied to & brainwashed by a hidden enemy with a sinister agenda.



This project is the result of two years of blood, sweat and tears by a team of woke professionals. It’s been independently produced and funded and is available on many different platforms for FREE for anyone to watch. Patriots made this documentary with the sole purpose of getting the truth out there. If you like the documentary, please share this video.


Official website: www.outofshadows.org